As I can see from the perspectives and arguments that citizen’s make, I would vote no on proposition 16. Already the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) has given $30 million into passing prop 16. This action then pressures the local government into focusing into winning votes. By voting no this ensures low prices on electricity from the side of PG&E, which most homeowners would want. Having new creations of electric service providers would mean that there would be a high increase in competition and the monopoly of PG&E would be defeated. Voting yes would mean that it would be harder to create or expand electric services giving already existing companies to keep their power to raise bills.
There should be a choice where people can choose who they can receive electricity from. Companies like PG&E just want a monopoly.
No comments:
Post a Comment